Obama and the Executive Order.

One of the things he overlooks is that two can play at that game. Wait until we have a republican POTUS!
With all the talk about Obumbles initiating "Emergency war powers" to thwart the election process, there is one definite action that any decent Republican President should take as soon as he is sworn in.
PART ONE:
1. Declare a National Emergency.
2. Invoke the war powers act.
3. Immediately instruct the military to bring the troops home from Afghanistan.
4. Assign those troops to our southern border.
5. Send our diplomat(s) to Mexico and inform them we are blockading the southern border--nobody in, or out!
6. Post notices in English and Spanish, "American Troops will shoot on sight anyone caught crossing this border, until further notice."
PART TWO:
1. Request congress immediately declare all communist and socialist sympathizers as "enemies of the state".
2. If congress blocks such a law, issue an Executive order declaring the same, under the war powers act.
3. Demand the Justice department initiate investigations to determine which persons, wherever they are located, are active communist, or socialist sympathizers.
4. Prosecute the active members as "enemies of the state".
5. Issue an executive order declaring the socialist and communist parties to be illegal.
PART THREE:
1. Withdraw all funding from the UN and declare ourselves independent of same.
2. Demand immediate withdrawal of all parties from the UN buildings.
3. Initiate a NEW United DEMOCRATIC Nations consisting of those countries which are either republics, or democracies. Refuse membership to communist, or socialist nations.
4. Publish a list of basic allies--those who will receive our commitment to defend with our lives. Include only those South American countries who demonstrate our values.

-And this is only the beginning. There should also be a part four on trade with partners and the use of our natural resources. A cessation of trade with those countries whose only intent is to bring us down and a beginning of more drilling along the coast and the interior shale deposits.
Why should we do all of this? Because socialists and communists are antithesis to the constitution. They are truly enemies of the state and should be charged as such. They do NOT have the best interests of the nation at heart and they never will.
We need to call a traitor a FREAKING TRAITOR for a change, instead of allowing them to claim they're "only expressing a different opinion"--and "free speech", etc.
We can no longer afford this weakness. These people intend to rule us and to destroy this country.
The same can be said for most Muslims in this country. A new president must immediately instruct the justice department that Sharia law is to be given no consideration in any decision in our courts.

We need strong measures to turn our nation around. The only people who deserve freedom, are those who will fight for it.

Unfortunately, I'm too old any more, or I'd be back in uniform fighting this administration with everything I had!
Wakey, wakey, America! You've got several commies in the various rat holes we used to call the Executive and Judicial branch of our government.

What's Happened to our Newspapers and TV News Programs?

Long title, huh?
Well, how else do you begin a discussion on the sad state of affairs the main stream media is in?
Remember the old term, "yellow journalism"? It was a term used to describe a paper, or news broadcast, who sensationalized the news to get readers/listeners. It also stood for an organization that "made up" news for the same purpose.

I can remember when I was a little twerp, reading about the antics of various news reporters who were idolized for their outstanding principles and their strict attention to the truth of the article.
Karl Mauldin was one such hero. He covered WW 2 from Europe to the Pacific theatre. There was never any challenge to the truth of his articles. He had a reputation for explaining the GI in combat--and the GI's loved him for it!
There were many other reporters nearly as well known, right along with the ones who were known for "cheating" on their articles.
But that's another story.

When I was in college, I majored in Journalism. We were taught some very high standards in being truthful. As a sports writer, at the time, I entered the news room to find the entire football team standing around my desk, waiting for me!
And those were some B-I-G dudes, let me tell you!
"What's up guys," I asked. A big finger poked under my nose and a bigger voice said, "Did you write this article", holding it up.
"Um, yas! See? My name is under the headline!"
"How come you're trying to make us look bad?"
"Sorry, I don't have to do that--you're doing a good enough job yourself."
"Listen, we need these stories to help us get scholarships to the bigger schools. Why can't you give us a break?"
"Did you guys win the game?"
"Well, no--but we had some good plays you could have talked about."
"Didn't you fumble the ball on your own 3 yard line, causing your team to lose the game?"
"Everybody fumbles once in a while!"
"Not if they want a good write up, they don't."

The moral of the story is, of course, I could have found "nice" things to say about the team if I had wanted to give the players a false sense of how well they were doing. The result was, there were no more fumbles the rest of the season, even though they lost several more games.

So this is what I learned in college. Tell the truth, even if you don't like it.

Why aren't the MSM doing that now?
And, since they aren't doing that, why aren't they ashamed of themselves?